Cases 11 - 20 of 1,740
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel v. U.S. Post Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Woods v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser
as 24-11815
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Adams v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Naytrone Adams
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Johnny Mason Atkinson, Austin Keith Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jamarius Walker
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Johnny Mason Atkinson, Austin Keith Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Johnny Mason Atkinson, Austin Keith Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Anthony v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terry Anthony
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Clifford Brown and Daniel Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
