Cases 11 - 20 of 3,483
Perkins v. Bywater
as 6:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Perkins
Defendant:
Kyle N Bywater and Kissimmee Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. Stokes et al
as 6:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Semiya Tahira Davis
Defendant:
Brain D. Stokes, Andrew Asher Bain and Dr. Andrea Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Greenfield v. Brodsky et al
as 2:2024cv14186
Plaintiff:
Kaylen Greenfield
Defendant:
Marc Brodsky, Manthmax Properties LLC and MARC D. BRODSKY REVOCABLE TRUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Daniel v. Veteran Affairs et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Veteran Affairs, Health Department and Glen Holding Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Daniel v. U.S. Post Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Carlissa Murphy
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC d/b/a Hyundai Manufacturing of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
