Cases 41 - 50 of 265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lorendzo Holte v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 23-10091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY MOODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, ED BROSKY and others
Whyte et al v. Noggle et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Counter Defendant:
Dale Whyte
Plaintiff:
Wendy Pryor
Defendant:
Caylee Noggle
Counter Claimant:
Georgia Department of Community Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reaves v. Knowlton et al
as 1:2022cv04765
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Carl Knowlton, Michael Cody Guined, Wendy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carswell v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv14393
Plaintiff:
Paul H Carswell
Defendant:
Wendy Diaz, Katy Reid, Susan Lynnett Carswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cockrell v. Bessemer City Board of Education
as 2:2022cv01494
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cockrell
Defendant:
Bessemer City Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
