Cases 61 - 70 of 438
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GAINES v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
RONNIE GAINES
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, EMILEE BRIGHT, DRAKE FAWCETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Davidson Homes LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mike Miller
Defendant:
Davidson Homes LLC, Davidson Home Group LLC, Elite Housing Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
De Gracia v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2021cv05286
Plaintiff:
Aldofo De Gracia
Defendant:
Clayton County, Clayton County Tax Commissioner's Office, Clayton County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Viehmann et al
as 8:2021cv02851
Plaintiff:
David Baker
Defendant:
Andrew Viehmann and City of St. Petersburg, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Baker et al
as 8:2021cv02780
Plaintiff:
Steven Kerr, Sr.
Defendant:
Gerald Baker, Christian Lopez and City of Plant City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv82076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Alabama Department of Mental Health et al
as 7:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Baker
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health, Humphrey and . Archibald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
