Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Yin et al v. Diaz et al
as 1:2024cv21129
Plaintiff:
Zhipeng Yin, Zhen Guo and Zhengfei Guan
Defendant:
Manny Diaz, Jr., Raymond Rodrigues, Board Member Ashley Bell Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Phillips
Defendant:
City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al
as 23-12740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY, ASIMA M. AZAM, TIM BOLDIG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eugene Long
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, County of Colbert Alabama, Max Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
