Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Cody Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NARCUSSE v. GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE et al
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marie Narcisse and MARIE M MARCISSE
Defendant:
GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE, Peter Wrobel, Shad Stormant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis Scott, et al v. City of Daytona Beach, Florida
as 23-13119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS SCOTT, CHAD DRIGGERS, DOUGLAS WILLIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott et al v. City of Daytona Beach Florida
as 6:2022cv02192
Plaintiff:
Dennis Scott, Chad Driggers, Douglas Willis and others
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach Florida
Amicus Curiae:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manuel v. The United States et al
as 1:2022cv04152
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Manuel
Defendant:
The United States and All Magistrate Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WOODEN v. ROWLANDS et al
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
SADIE DARNELL, CLOVIS WATSON, JR and MICHAEL ROWLANDS
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WOODEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PALMGREN v. DONOVAN et al
as 3:2019cv00080
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL, WILLIAM BLAKE WEEKLEY, OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON PALMGREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
