Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Abernathy v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dasha Abernathy
Defendant:
Officer Devon Dawson, Officer White, Officer Derrick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennington v. Tuscaloosa County, Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Garrick Pennington
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. Tuscaloosa County
as 7:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Derek Stokes
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County and Sheriff Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Millsap et al
as 4:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Desmon Green and Coretta Green
Defendant:
Clark Millsap and Deputy Phillip Abernathy
Henry v. Abernathy et al
as 2:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Bruce Henry
Defendant:
Ron Abernathy, Hays Webb and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Bartow County Board of Commissioners, Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Bernice Clinton Roberts
Defendant:
Bartow County Board of Commissioners, Georgia, Clark Millsap, Bartow County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. County of Limestone, Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Deputy Jake Abernathy, Srt. Commander Rhett McNatt, County of Limestone, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Ronald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Abbett et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Geni Abernathy, Blake Jennings, Brandi Meadows and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Corley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rahrer v. Deal et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
Leslie Abernathy-Maddox, Janet Bagely, Russel Troy McClelland and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
