Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Billips-Yeshurun v. Rocket Mortgage(MAG+)
as 3:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Diann Billips-Yeshurun
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2022cv02420
Plaintiff:
Diann Marie Henry
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Molden et al v. American Arbitration Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01833
Plaintiff:
Regina S. Molden and Dianne Madray
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association, Inc. (New York) doing business as American Arbitration Association or AAA, Crow Vote LLC doing business as Fab Over 40 and Darrin Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Higbee et al v. City of Jacksonville
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Dianne Higbee and Jay Higbee
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 4:2021cv00049
Defendant:
SCOTT KINGSLEY SWIFT, ROBERT HINKLE, DIANNE TURNER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Levesque v. City of West Melbourne et al
as 6:2019cv02187
Defendant:
Jacob Mathis, City of West Melbourne, Danielle Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Dianne Levesque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Meuse et al
as 1:2019cv05013
Defendant:
Dianne Meuse and Southeast Corrections, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
