Cases 1 - 10 of 42
CASEY v. INNOVATION FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 5:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
INNOVATION FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION and JEREMY HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton v. Tuscaloosa, The City of et al
as 7:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tonya Hinton
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa, The City of, Griffin, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua English, et al v. Jonathan Fowler, et al
as 22-10927
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA PAUL ENGLISH, as Surviving Parent of Adam Paul English, Deceased, LAURA LEAH KING, as Surviving Parent of Adam Paul English, Deceased and MIKE HINTON, Administrator of the Estate of Adam Paul English
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN FOWLER and JOSE HERNANDEZ
Hinton v. Grieco et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hinton
Defendant:
Paul Grieco, Stacy Webb, Malcolm Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooker v. People of GA et al
as 1:2020cv03720
Defendant:
Natalle Hall, Charles Jackson, Kristy Hinton and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Darrell Hooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
