Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Hammond et al v. Strickland et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ketavious Javon Hammond and Tavon Hammond
Defendant:
K. Smith and Brad Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Pee v. Johnathan Zimmerman, et al
as 24-12211
Defendant:
CAPTAIN STRICKLAND KEVIN, OFFICER DAVID FANEGIO, SERGEANT MARIO ALARCON and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANDREA PEE
Sole v. The City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02760
Defendant:
Doe Officer R. Strickland, The City of Atlanta, Doe Officer B. Lecontts and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Terry Reed v. Denny Strickland, III, et al
as 24-10435
Plaintiff:
TERRY M. REED
Defendant:
DENNY L. STRICKLAND, III, as father and next friend of minor child, Deceased, individual and official capacity, JOHN PAUL BOSWELL, individual and official capacity, WESLEY LAVON PEARSON, JR., individual and official capacity and others
Sutton v. Strickland-Lucas et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Montanique Latrice Sutton
Defendant:
James Strickland-Lucas, Fulton County Sheriff Department, Atlanta Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
