Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Marcano et al v. Orange County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Marlon Marcano, Yma Su-Ling and Yma Su-Ling Scarbriel
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Office, Samir Paulino and Kenneth Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Joe Harris v. Attorney General State of Alabama, et al
as 22-12454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA, FREDRICK ALBERT, YOLANDA STOKES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jane Doe 3 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03843
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., John Does 1-10, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589
Jane Doe 1 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03840
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., John Does 1-10, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1
Petitioner:
Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Forced Labor, Sex Trafficking
Jane Doe 4 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03845
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., John Does 1-10, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 4
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589
Jane Doe 2 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03841
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., John Does 1-10, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
