Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Caplan v. Vargas et al
as 0:2022cv62010
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
YACKELIN LIZ VARGAS an Individual doing business as IN STYLE TIRES, JOHNNIE LEWIS, JR, Yackelin Liz Vargas doing business as IN STYLE TIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv10058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Vargas v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Johnny Vargas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Vargas v. City of Largo, Florida et al
as 8:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Fintan Vargas
Defendant:
City of Largo, Florida and Thomas Disney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vargas v. Ratinez
as 0:2020cv62430
Plaintiff:
Gloria Lewis Vargas
Defendant:
Steven Ratinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargas v. Sojack
as 8:2020cv01967
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Vargas
Defendant:
Jeffrey Sojack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
F.V. et al v. Randolph County Board of Education et al
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Randolph County Board of Education, Randolph County School System, Jimmie Fryer and others
Plaintiff:
F. V. and Amber Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
