Cases 11 - 20 of 439
TAYLOR v. BARNES
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
LT BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fridriksson v. Cunningham et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Chance Brogan Fridriksson
Defendant:
Dorris LNU, Aaron LNU, FNU Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Coast, Jr. v. Michael Hartmeyer, et al
as 23-13502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME COAST, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARTMEYER, WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON, JACKSON and others
Hatcher v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Officer Macfallen, Officer Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steelman v. Yes Care Corp Behavioral Health
as 6:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
Yes Care Corp Behavioral Health and A. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BARNES et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BARNES and BLAKE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Gene Barnes v. Coffee CF Warden
as 23-12070
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD GENE BARNES
Respondent / Appellee:
COFFEE CF WARDEN
FLAVOR v. HOLT et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONNIE HOLT, SHERIFF MARKLEY, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stanley
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Damon Hininger, Warden Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
