Cases 11 - 20 of 1,056
Bright v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bright
Defendant:
FNU Clark and FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. USA
as 4:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
FREDDIE CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Boe v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Darren Clark Boe
Defendant:
Courts of Acworth of the State of Georgia and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERT-RICHARD BRYANT
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT, CLARKE COUNTY JAIL, ALVIN S GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Barrow County Jail
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Barrow County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Braxton Clark
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter, Raymond Mitchell Keeton, Courtney Morgan and others
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Merrill Clark Gardner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. McFarlene et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Major Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlene, Lt. Griffin, Cert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
