Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Easley v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Devon Martez Easley
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Gamble
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Easley
Defendant:
J. Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. TROTMAN et al
as 5:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
LT TROTMAN, LT WALLER, LT BOOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Easley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10046
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICARDO EASLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
COX v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A COX
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 5:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DEPARTMENT WARDEN LAWRENCE EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. BEASLEY et al
as 5:2020cv00424
Defendant:
BEASLEY, OFFICER LESLIE, SERGEANT WALLER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
