Cases 11 - 20 of 1,244
Mosely v. Hamm
as 2:2024cv00942
Defendant:
John Hamm
Plaintiff:
Travis Cintell Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Raybon
as 4:2024cv00882
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Petitioner:
Stephon Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm
Petitioner:
Wayne Holleman Travis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
West v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne West
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Emberton, Detrick McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Defendant:
John Hamm, C. Simpson, Michael Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Defendant:
John Hamm, Phyllis Morgan, Michael Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Sykes and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Defendant:
Lt. Corcino, Tony Peterson, John Q. Hamm and others
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Defendant:
Jacari Benton, Christopher Gordy, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
