Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 8:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Trask O'ryan Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratcliff v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02010
Petitioner:
David Marc Ratcliff
Respondent:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dept. of Trans., USP Atlanta Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew James Choy v. United States Southern District of Florida, et al
as 22-10273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES CHOY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, BOP, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Turner v. U.S. Marshal's Office
as 5:2021cv00595
Petitioner:
Clifford P. Turner
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. U.S. Marshals Office
as 3:2021cv01183
Plaintiff:
Clifford P. Turner
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Destra v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv23938
Plaintiff:
Ronald Destra
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Marshal, Federal Detention Center of Miami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 4:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray White, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals and LaSalle Corrections Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. U.S. Marshals et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00285
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
