Cases 21 - 30 of 1,144
Frank Pierre v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-13264
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK PIERRE
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv23705
Plaintiff:
Scotty Santos Diaz
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Marilennys Vazquez, Dena Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Steiner et al
as 8:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
Tawon D. Riley
Defendant:
Frank Steiner, State of Florida and Authorized Reps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brogdon v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Craig Bruce Brogdon
Defendant:
State of Georgia, County of Cherokee, Cherokee County Sheriffs Department and others
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorian O'Kelley v. Warden GDP
as 23-12947
Petitioner / Appellant:
DORIAN FRANK O'KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Timms v. Aspinwall et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Timms
Defendant:
Frank Aspinwall, Stephen Tillman and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Steiner et al
as 8:2023cv01947
Plaintiff:
Tawon D. Riley
Defendant:
Frank Steiner and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timms v. Aspinwall et al
as 4:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Timms
Defendant:
Frank Aspinwall, Stephen Tillman and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. BERNARD
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
WILLARD FRANK WHITE
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
