Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Hinton v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2016cv00915
Plaintiff:
Talashia Hinton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hinton v. Ring
as 6:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
Michael David Hinton
Defendant:
Albert Ring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Hinton
as 1:2016cv02247
Petitioner:
Ronald Eaton
Respondent:
Felicia Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VITTO v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN VITTO
Defendant:
GLEN JOHNSON, JAMES HINTON, PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Pickensville Police Dept. et al
as 7:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Dean Hinton
Defendant:
Pickensville Police Dept., Faye Simpson, Jerry McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2014cv00442
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHN RAYMOND DANIELS
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, FELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHELTON R THOMAS
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, SHARON LEWIS, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
DEXTER RAMONE PALMER
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, GEORGE IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. OWENS et al
as 5:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H POWELL
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Smith v. Warden Stanley Williams, et al
as 14-10550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Smith State Prison, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN, Security, Smith State Prison, Individually and in his official capacity, JAMES DONALD, Chairman of GA Board of Pardons & Paroles, Individually and in his official capacity. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
