Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01463
Petitioner:
Michael James Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cody v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv04446
Plaintiff:
Michael Cody
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brown and Michael James
Butler v. Brown et al
as 5:2012cv00355
Plaintiff:
Michael James Butler
Defendant:
Shirley Brown, Stacy L. George, Michelle R. Bishop and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES HILL
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, VICTORIA MALONE and Dawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomaszewski v. Colton et al
as 2:2011cv14243
Plaintiff:
Michael James Tomaszewski
Defendant:
Bruce H. Colton and Linda C. Craft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv08023
Petitioner:
Michael James Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01490
Plaintiff:
Michael James Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Correctional Medical Services (INMATE1)
as 3:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
Michael James Dixon
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00452
Petitioner:
Michael James Hubbard
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zwick v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv02191
Petitioner:
Michael James Zwick
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
