Cases 21 - 30 of 812
Daniels v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Gwendolyn Babers, Officer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Grady Judd, FNU Fain, FNU Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Peterson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Officer Peterson, Officer Debose, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Auburndale Police Deparment et al
as 8:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Deparment, FNU Rudolph, FNU Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Cortez et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Randy Simmons
Defendant:
Joaquin Cortez, Judge Russell Cavendar, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Helton et al
as 5:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Taug N Walker
Defendant:
Jason Helton, Scott Jenson and Russell Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
