Cases 31 - 40 of 2,932
Moore v. Martin et al
as 5:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jason Everett Moore
Defendant:
Mark Martin, Edward Lewter, Kevin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crouch v. Jessup
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Edward Jasper Crouch
Respondent:
Stephen Jessup
Other:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKennie, Jr. v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60326
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward McKennie, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Edwards v. USA
as 24-10501
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHN EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blackmon v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jareece Edward Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Posey v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Posey
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Sgt. Anderson and Michael W. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
