Cases 31 - 40 of 629
Parker v. Parker
as 2:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Parker
Defendant:
Cortina Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Bullock v. Walter Berry, et al
as 23-12652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER BERRY, LUMPKIN, SANFORD and others
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jones
as 2:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Linda Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, Mayor SKIP HENDERSON, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Bond et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Eugene Boyd
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Parker Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PECCI-ANDUJAR v. PARKER et al
as 3:2023cv12173
Defendant:
J PARKER, A KIRKLAND, AUSTIN GULLETT and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PECCI-ANDUJAR v. PARKER et al
as 5:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR
Defendant:
J PARKER, A KIRKLAND, AUSTIN GULLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
