Cases 31 - 40 of 70
SPRINGS v. GIELOW
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, M ALLEN, A BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00171
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Demetrius Springs v. W. Gielow, et al
as 14-11436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS L. SPRINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
W. L. GIELOW, Lieutenant, KYLE HALL, Sgt, KASAROVICH, Officer and others
SPRINGS v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, KYLE HALL, KASAROVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springs v. Taylor et al
as 3:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Springs
Defendant:
Alex Taylor, Norman Thigpen, Marvin Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Springs v. John Doe Graham, et al
as 13-14729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS L. SPRINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE GRAHAM, DONNETTA ROBINSON, JOHN DOE LESLEY and others
Springs v. Graham et al
as 3:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Springs
Defendant:
John Doe Graham, Donnetta Robinson, John Doe Lesley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRING v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2013cv00001
Petitioner:
WESLEY ALAN SPRING
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Cherokee Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2012cv02505
Plaintiff:
Johnny Loyd Ingram
Defendant:
Cherokee Sheriff's Office, Holly Springs Police Department, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
