Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Truesdale v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2018cv22286
Plaintiff:
William James Truesdale
Defendant:
State of Florida, Defense Attorney, FDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00286
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Julie Jones, FNU Riedl, FNU Southerland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Mantooth v. Floyd County, et al
as 18-12217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JAMES MANTOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOYD COUNTY, Municipality, EMILY JOHNSON, et al (Floyd County District Attorney's Office), DARELL DONALDSON and others
Copeland v. Jordan et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Kevin Jordan, FNU McKree, FNU Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. District Attorney Spencer et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tate
Defendant:
District Attorney Spencer, Ray Norris, Clarke County Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mantooth v. Floyd County et al
as 4:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Harold James Mantooth
Defendant:
Floyd County, Emily Johnson, Darell Donaldson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rieber v. Dunn
as 5:2018cv00337
Petitioner:
Jeffery Day Rieber
Respondent:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Darrell T. Price
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Greg Dozier, Coffee Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Dunn et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gary Day
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Crow and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Hunter v. CXW, et al
as 18-10055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
