Cases 51 - 60 of 2,219
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
DiAngelo K. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
LEWIS v. BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVY v. BARBER et al
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PEAVY and MIKHAI AL-QUADI
Defendant:
BARBER, HUBBARD, K JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Ben Hill County, Georgia
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Ben Hill County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
