Cases 61 - 70 of 881
Baker v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv22327
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Baker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Corpus v. Elkins et al
as 2:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Harper Elkins, Cheryl D. Dicks, Courtney Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Baker
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Deputy Warden Watson, Cert Officer Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Armor Health Care et al
as 2:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Alphonda C. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Armor Health Care and Dr. Jean Max Saint Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Germaine Smart v. Ronald England, et al
as 22-11738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERMAINE SMART
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ENGLAND, GARY MALONE and LARRY BAKER
Corpus v. Monsalud et al
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Mary Monsalud, Riddle and Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Baker et al
as 5:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Steve Venkins and Steve Everette Jenkins
Defendant:
R. Baker and FNU Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Armor Health Care
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Alphonda Baker
Defendant:
Armor Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2022cv00875
Petitioner:
Desmond Baker
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
