Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Conners
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Trevino et al
as 2:2014cv14453
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Trevino, Lobel, T. Salerno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. State of Florida
as 8:2014cv02829
Petitioner:
Antonio Conner
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moises Bure v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-14755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOISES E. BURE
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. ADAMS, Assistant Secretary, KATHY CONNER, Assistant Secretary and others
Conner v. Estes
as 2:2014cv01889
Plaintiff:
Curtis Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
DeWayne Estes
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Moton, Jr. v. A. Conner
as 14-12008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS MARTIN MOTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
A. B. CONNER, a.k.a. A. B. Conners
Bure v. Crews et al
as 2:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Moises E. Bure
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, J. Adams, Kathy Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
DONNAVON MAURICE OWENS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WASHINGTON STATE PRISON, ROBERT CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv02683
Petitioner:
Robert E. Conner
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Conner v. GDCP Warden
as 13-13928
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE CONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
