Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 158
McGaha v. Emberg et al
as 6:2016cv00227
Plaintiff: Matthew McGaha
Defendant: K Emberg, Kelley Godifrey, Jim Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Kelley v. Warden, et al
as 16-10182
Petitioner - Appellant: JOEL C. KELLEY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Kelly v. Baldwin County Correctional Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: Royce J. Kelley, III
Defendant: Baldwin County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Ogle
as 1:2015cv03894
Plaintiff: Roderick D. Kelley
Defendant: G. Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Benton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00099
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD LACKEY, JR
Defendant: Eugene Benton, Megan Pulsts and DAVID KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Kelley v. Stewart et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01189
Petitioner: Charles David O'Kelley
Respondent: Cynthia Stewart and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v HARDY, et al.
as 7:2015cv00081
Plaintiff: CRAIG L JONES
Defendant: JAMES E. HARDY, ROBERT RAY AUMAN and STEVEN B KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Kelley v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00104
Petitioner: Dorian Frank O'Kelley
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Jones v. James Hardy, et al
as 15-11288
Plaintiff - Appellant: CRAIG L. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES E. HARDY, District Attorney, ROBERT RAY AUMAN and STEVEN B. KELLEY
JONES v. HARDY et al
as 7:2015cv00018
Plaintiff: CRAIG L JONES
Defendant: JAMES E. HARDY, ROBERT RAY AUMAN and STEVEN B KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?