Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Franklin v. Department of Detention Services et al
as 8:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Donnell A. Franklin
Defendant:
Department of Detention Services, Falkenburg Road Jail, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cesar Contreras v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 22-11160
Petitioner / Appellant:
CESAR AUGUSTO CONTRERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Contreras v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv24311
Plaintiff:
Yuri C. Contreras
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Dade Correctional Instution Warden, Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras-Garza v. Venuto et al
as 5:2021cv00185
Defendant:
FNU Murphy, R.C. Cheatham, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Contreras-Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Contreras v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2020cv01019
Defendant:
Jimmy Thomas and Steven Troy Marshall
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Delreal Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Alan
as 4:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Martique L. King
Defendant:
Officer Contreras Alan and Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Secretary, DOC (Lee County)
as 2:2019cv00188
Petitioner:
Cesar Augusto Contreras
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00567
Petitioner:
Henry Adam Contreras
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Contreras v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00033
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Ramirez-Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
