Cases 1 - 10 of 1,017
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Swain et al
as 8:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Justin Wallace Bryant
Defendant:
Swain, Kennedy, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. NEWBERN et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY T HILL
Defendant:
E NEWBERN, KIGHT, VAN HOUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adams Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
