Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Leigh v. GA Judicial System, et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Tremaine Deshun Leigh
Respondent:
Georgia State Judicial System, GA Judicial System and George Ivory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Officer Macfallen, Officer Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catrell Ivory v. USA
as 23-10123
Petitioner / Appellant:
CATRELL IVORY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DIARRA v. KEMP et al
as 1:2021cv02789
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Hon. Brian Kemp, Chief of Police, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ivory v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv01138
Petitioner:
Catrell Ivory
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DIARRA v. KEMP et al
as 4:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, CHIEF OF POLICE, JOE BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diarra v. The Embassy of Ivory Coast et al
as 1:2021cv02657
Defendant:
The Embassy of Ivory Coast, The Embassy of Saudia Arabia and Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Naph Care Dental Service et al
as 1:2021cv01593
Plaintiff:
Estercardo Paire Ivory, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Satin, Naph Care Dental Service and Karen Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgerson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keller, Walter Woods, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
James Ivory Edgerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Maddox et al
as 1:2020cv03306
Defendant:
Officer Gray, Sgt. Wilson, S. Fallin and others
Plaintiff:
Estercardo P. Ivory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
