Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gaines et al
as 2:2019cv01715
Defendant:
R Brown, Teague, R Gaines and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sutton et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00268
Defendant:
L. Williams, Byron Caylor, Coffee County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinnett v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Cathy Ross Vinnett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, A Washington Adduci, M Reherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Aducci et al
as 7:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Aducci, L Williams, Ms. Eli and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale et al
as 2:2016cv01724
Petitioner:
Derrick L Williams
Respondent:
Mike Hale, Brandon Falls and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Howard et al
as 7:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Angelique B Harris
Defendant:
D Howard, W Issac, J Hulett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Howard et al
as 7:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Christina LaShaun Flowers
Defendant:
D Howard, W Isaac, J Hulett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
