Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Boston et al
as 1:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Sherry Boston and Richard W. Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus Rose, Jr. v. Sherwood Bauer, Jr., et al
as 22-13719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUGUSTUS ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERWOOD BAUER, JR., DAN L. VAUGHN, MICHAEL CARLTON HEISEY and others
Averett v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv00406
Plaintiff:
Corry Averett
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Betty Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOY v. MARCUS
as 1:2019cv00224
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W FOY
Defendant:
MANAGER MARCUS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL et al
as 1:2019cv00084
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W FOY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL, Warden WALTER BERRY, DR WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rathke v. Dyer et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00923
Defendant:
Teresa Dyer, Heath Taylor and Lt. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Rathke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 1:2017cv02321
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Ural D. Glanville, Paul L. Howard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 1:2017cv01893
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Ural D. Glanville, Paul L. Howard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Rhodes, Jr. v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 15-14219
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD W. RHODES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
