Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Riley, Sean v. St. Lucie County et al
as 2:2024cv14160
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
St. Lucie County, Petri Maze, Sgt. Lamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shinn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00956
Petitioner:
Lavon R. Shinn
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shinn v. Young et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Defendant:
Mr. Brannan, Mr. Carter, Glen Young and others
Plaintiff:
Tobais Shinn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00913
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Tobais Shinn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pope v. Shinn et al
as 5:2018cv00626
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, SIS/SIA, Designations Sentence Computation Center and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brunson v. Shinn
as 1:2016cv22913
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brunson
Defendant:
Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shinn v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00428
Plaintiff:
Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00349
Petitioner:
Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
