Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,514
Casey v. Terry et al
as 3:2024cv01260
Defendant: NAPH Care, David Terry, Thomas Freese and others
Plaintiff: Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00499
Petitioner: Daniel W. Terry
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGuffie v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00087
Petitioner: Terry J. McGuffie
Respondent: Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moomey v. Tracey Jackson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00579
Defendant: Elmore County Jail, Nurse Terry, Tracy Jackson and others
Plaintiff: Adam M. Moomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohannon v. Raybon
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner: Jerry Dwayne Bohannon
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23303
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23304
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff: Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00145
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Plaintiff: TERRY T DAVIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Raybon
as 4:2024cv00882
Respondent: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Petitioner: Stephon Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?