Cases 1 - 10 of 9,478
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00591
Petitioner:
William Carl Sanders
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lawson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams
Defendant:
Angela Lawson, Megan Fulghum, Valicia White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Smith et al.
as 6:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
William Andre Jemel Wright
Defendant:
Officer L. Smith and City of Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spalding County Law Authorities
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Spalding County Law Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv22130
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Williams v. Drake et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Brian Coleman, Mr. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
