Cases 1 - 10 of 1,451
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Defendant:
Larisee, Warden Sidney Carter, Sikes and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Andrew Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Mr. Hall, Paul Johnson, Cody Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Trevon DeShon Chapman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATRICK v. ENNIS et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Defendant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON, SHELLEY MILTON, JUDGE EDGAR W ENNIS, JR and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT PATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Chilton County (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00500
Respondent:
Chilton County
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patrick v. Ennis et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Shelley Milton, Judge Edgar W. Ennis, Jr., William Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 7:2024cv01042
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutt v. Carter
as 7:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Devontay Jerrod Hutt
Respondent:
Warden T Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
