Cases 1 - 10 of 1,439
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 6:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Bailey
Defendant:
Kevin Williams, Rache Smith, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv02733
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Victor Hill, Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Tyler W. Norman, Sgt. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Braggs v. Carter et al
as 8:2024cv01331
Plaintiff:
Darius Travell Braggs
Defendant:
S. Carter, Mrs. Ward, Mrs. Sapov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh and Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent Jacoby v. Fisher, et al
as 24-11695
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant:
FISHER, LEE, HUTTON and others
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
