Cases 1 - 10 of 1,785
Allendes, Ismael-Christopher v. Wessel
as 1:2024cv23594
Plaintiff:
Ismael-Christopher Allendes
Defendant:
Thomas H. Wessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. COMERFORD et al
as 4:2024cv00364
Defendant:
H GIBSON, L MCLYMONT and M COMERFORD
Plaintiff:
JULIO MANUEL PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, SNELL, L GAINER and others
Plaintiff:
DEONSEY LONTE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01083
Defendant:
Judge Phil K Seay, Steve T Marshall, Carol Bone and others
Plaintiff:
William H Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verellen Hudgins v. Seymore
as 8:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Sylvia H. Verellen Hudgins
Defendant:
Ray Seymore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Roberson v. John Doe, et al
as 24-12371
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL ROBERSON
Defendant:
STEVEN SETZER, KEVIN H. TURNER, JOHN DOE and others
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 5:2024cv00350
Defendant:
FNU Stevens, C. Edelen, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Mark Hines
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Selden v. Biden et al
as 8:2024cv01529
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Bennett H. Terryln, Ashley Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Selden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
