Cases 91 - 100 of 146
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Jr. and The City of Andalusia
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03283
Plaintiff:
COULBOURNE RADER, JOSH EMMETT, MIGUEL AYON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCLAIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HAGER, JOSHUA WIKHOLM, DANNY BRADEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HICKS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03082
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HAHN, AMORRIS CONLEY, JONATHAN STARK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. The Kroger Company
as 1:2019cv03271
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Federal Trade Commission v. Pointbreak Media, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv61017
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Pointbreak Media, LLC, DCP Marketing, LLC, Modern Spotlight Group LLC and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Receiver:
Jonathan E. Perlman
Mediator:
Eunice Baros
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
ARDIS v. BERGOSH, et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
GARY BERGOSH, PAMELA CHILDERS, LAURA DANHEISSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00945
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. MICHAEL JONES
as 3:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
KEITH DARRYL LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL JONES, NICHOLAS GEEKER, RICHARD SCHERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
