Cases 101 - 110 of 183
Cameron v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00842
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Correctional Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lord v. Richmond County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Lord
Defendant:
Richmond County Jail, Correctional Medical Services and Augusta Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Correctional Medical Services (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00749
Plaintiff:
Carlton D. Welch
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. White et al
as 2:2010cv02257
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dale Bennett
Defendant:
Robert White, Corrections Medical Services and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Martin Campbell
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Phyllis Billups and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlpine v. Allen et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McAlpine
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Correctional Medical Services, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Correctional Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Owens
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00645
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Louis Boyd, Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Correctional Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00640
Plaintiff:
Clinton Jones
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutland v. Marino et al
as 2:2010cv01918
Plaintiff:
Brian M Rutland
Defendant:
Jopseh Marino, T Schroeder, Douglas Green and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
