Cases 111 - 120 of 125
Sloan v. McGrady
as 8:2009cv02609
Plaintiff:
Marius D. Sloan
Defendant:
J. Thomas McGrady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Jensen Telecom, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv02018
Plaintiff:
William J. Thomas
Defendant:
Jensen Telecom, Inc. and David M. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Caison v. Reddish et al
as 3:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Caison
Defendant:
B. Reddish, S. T. Robinson, Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00114
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Frazier v. Kennington et al
as 3:2009cv00909
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bernard Frazier
Defendant:
D. Kennington, J. Smith, Jr., B. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GMAC INC v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
GMAC INC and GMAC INC
Defendant:
BRUCE H. THOMAS, CHRISTINE M THOMAS and EVELYN J THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725 Collection under Contract Guaranty
Minniefield v. Thomas et al
as 2:2009cv00175
Petitioner:
Demetrius Ray Minniefield
Respondent:
Willie J. Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAUCIER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2008cv00236
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY SAUCIER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C ATKINS, MICHAEL E MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Godwin et al
as 1:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Harry J Thomas
Defendant:
Brenda Godwin, Johnny Yearby and Delta Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
