Cases 111 - 120 of 566
Bradley v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00629
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Julius Brian Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00560
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamar Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Tracy Jones and Alabama Pardons & Paroles
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitt v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Tracy Jones and Alabama Pardons & Paroles
Plaintiff:
Antwan DeShawn Kitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veitch v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00448
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Veitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00220
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BURNETT
Respondent:
SHERIFF LOGAN MARSHALL, DR R L HANZLICK, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughn v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00453
Defendant:
Tracy Jones and Alabama Pardons & Paroles
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lamar Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quincey Smith v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-11632
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, BRAXTON T. COTTON, Vice Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCEY SMITH
Chiarizio v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
