Cases 121 - 130 of 725
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. U. S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv04358
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson
Defendant:
U. S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Atlanta, GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridges v. Warden et al
as 7:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Comulus L Bridges
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 5:2020cv00489
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayden v. Garrett
as 7:2020cv01405
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Petitioner:
Opal Hayden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Unit Team Isaac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flippo v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Mr Brown and The Medical and Health Staff
Plaintiff:
Dana Flippo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Southeast Regional Office et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Jesup Federal Correctional Constitution (FCI) and Federal Bureau of Prisons Southeast Regional Office
Szekely v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv24377
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Naphcare, Inc. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Szekely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01140
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms. Medley, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie Strickland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv03293
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dr Chakos, Dr Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wyatt Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
