Cases 11 - 20 of 1,742
Doctor v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Armando Jermaal Doctor
Defendant:
Barnes, Brown, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Monts et al
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Monts and Shirslene Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Woodard et al v. INSUL-CO.
as 9:2024cv80345
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Woodard, George Steve Stripling, Dustin K. Hall and others
Defendant:
INSUL-CO, Inc doing business as J.R. Swanson Plumbing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Barnes v. Zupkow
as 1:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Saharon Barnes
Defendant:
Phyllis Zupkow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nathan Roach v. Liberty County Jail, et al
as 24-10706
Plaintiff:
NATHAN AVERY ROACH
Defendant:
LIBERTY COUNTY JAIL, MCEADY, KRUMNOW and others
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Nikita Barnes v. Guild Mortgage/ Guild Holding, et al
as 24-10676
Plaintiff:
NIKITA LYNETTE BARNES
Defendant:
GUILD MORTGAGE/ GUILD HOLDING and DESIREE KRAMER
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Seminole)
as 6:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Antward Alashaundra Barnes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. Doctors Medcare et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chad Riley
Defendant:
Doctors Medcare, Carrie McClung, Sgt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barn v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert Barn
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
