Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Smith v. Dade County Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv20845
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Dade County Corrections, T. Tomson and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hunts et al
as 1:2023cv20778
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Hunts, P. Skyles, Nursing Staff Kendal Region Medical Center and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Dade County Corrections, T. Tomson and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Capital One Banking, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
William J Johnson
Defendant:
Capiton One Banking, Inc, Capitol One Banking, Capital One Banking, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murzike v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Williams, J. Taylor, R. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven D'Amico v. Jennifer Johnson
as 23-10049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN F. D'AMICO
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER J. JOHNSON, Judicial Agent
In re: Dennis Johnson
as 22-13510
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS J. JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D'AMICO v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00250
Petitioner:
STEVEN FRANCIS D'AMICO
Defendant:
Jennifer J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D'Amico v. Johnson
as 5:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
Jennifer J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Miller
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Brenton J. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. E. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
