Cases 11 - 20 of 1,035
Brown v. Sharpe et al
as 6:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Micki Brown
Defendant:
Unit Manager Juanita Sharpe, Unit Manager Victoria Weston, Lieutenant Briana Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan
as 23-13596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 23-13685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, TIMOTHY BROGLIO and US CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Sharp v. Broglio et al
as 8:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Broglio and Timothy Dolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sharpe v. Scott Logistics Corp.
as 1:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Sharpe
Defendant:
Scott Logistics Corp.
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sharp v. Dolan
as 8:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Archbishop Timothy Dolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharp v. Dolan et al
as 8:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Dolan, Archbishop Timothy Broglio and U.S. Conference Catholic Bishop
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
