Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Clark v. Price et al
as 2:2016cv00919
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Clark
Defendant:
Cody Price, Clinton Johnson and Nathaniel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Clark
as 6:2015mc00071
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Michael B. Clark
Cause Of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Steve Clark v. State of Florida, et al
as 15-14208
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE B. CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clark v. Butler & Hosch, P.A. et al
as 2:2014cv14183
Plaintiff:
Margaret B. Clark
Defendant:
Butler & Hosch, P.A. and Nelson A. Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clark v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2014cv14112
Plaintiff:
Steve B. Clark
Defendant:
State of Florida and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Downing et al v. Gordon County
as 4:2012mi00003
Plaintiff:
Cindy E. Downing , Kelli B. Clark and Downing Clark Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Gordon County
Movant:
Georgia Department of Human Services
Clark v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02796
Plaintiff:
Robert B Clark
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. State of Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2012cv14275
Plaintiff:
Steve B Clark
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC v. CLARK et al
as 3:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
CHARLES H CLARK, III , ELIZABETH B CLARK and EMERALD GRANDE WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Downing et al v. Gordon County et al
as 4:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Cindy E. Downing , Kelli B. Clark and Downing Clark Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Gordon County , Mitch Ralston , Josh J. Vinall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
