Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Heard et al v. Collins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. OWENS et al
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEARD
Defendant: BRIAN OWENS, AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cobble v. C. Royal, et al
as 13-13837
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee: C. ASHLEY ROYAL, WARDEN and PATRICK HEAD
COBBLE v. ROYAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00277
Petitioner: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent: C ASHLEY ROYAL, SHEILA OUBRE and PATRICK HEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: William O'Kelly, E. Clayton Scofield, Sam Olens and others
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: William C. O'Kelly, C. Ashley Royal, E. Clayton Scofield and others
Heard v. Owens
as 1:2012cv04318
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Brian Owens, Sam Olens, Nathan Deal and others
Rufus v. State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03869
Plaintiff: Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant: State of Georgia, Samuel D. Ozburn, Public Defender Office of the Alcovy Judicial Circuit and others
Michael London v. State of Georgia, et al
as 11-11286
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL LONDON
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and C. ASHLEY ROYAL, United States Judge
London v. State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00082
Plaintiff: Michael London
Defendant: State of Georgia, United States and C. Ashley Royal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?